Civil Litigation,
California Courts of Appeal
Sep. 16, 2015
Lawsuit presents anti-SLAPP conundrum
A lawsuit in Orange County recently presented an interesting anti-SLAPP statute conundrum: Who should decide in the first instance whether a defendant's conduct furthered the subject's free speech rights?
A lawsuit in Orange County recently presented an interesting anti-SLAPP statute conundrum: Who (trial court or Court of Appeal) should decide in the first instance whether a defendant's conduct furthered the subject defendant's free speech rights (with availability of anti-SLAPP in the balance)? Collier v. Harris, 2015 DJDAR 10209 (Sept. 1, 2015).
Julie Collier and Chris Korpi had been active supporters of competing candidates in ...For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In