This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment

Jun. 18, 2016

Doubting her record-keeping, Uber objectors not swayed by lawyer's fee reduction request

Uber drivers' besieged lawyer Shannon Liss-Riordan's late gambit to slash her fee request by $10 million may not salvage a controversial settlement but instead call attention to her failure to keep billing records.

By Matthew Blake
Daily Journal Staff Writer

Uber drivers' besieged lawyer Shannon Liss-Riordan's late gambit to slash her fee request by $10 million may not salvage a controversial settlement but instead call attention to her failure to keep billing records.

After U.S. District Judge Edward M. Chen's hearing early this month on whether to initially approve an up to $100 million deal that Liss-Riordan, of Boston-based Lichten & Liss-Rior...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up