This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Law Practice

Mar. 17, 2000

No Compassion for the

In the Public Interest By David A. Lash Primary day in California left far too many in a secondary position. It was generally not a good day to be relatively voiceless, as few candidates or voters raised their voices with compassion. The failure of Proposition 26, the passage of Proposition 22 and the relative silence on issues of concern to the poor from the presidential candidates has sent a stinging message.

David A. Lash

Managing Counsel for Pro Bono and Public Services, O'Melveny & Myers LLP

The opinions expressed here are his own.

By David A. Lash
        Primary day in California left far too many in a secondary position. It was generally not a good day to be relatively voiceless, as few candidates or voters raised their voices with compassion. The failure of Proposition 26, the passage of Proposition 22 and the relative silence on issues of concern to the poor from the presidential candidates has sent a stinging me...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)