By Laura Ernde
Daily Journal Staff Writer
SAN FRANCISCO - A state appellate court Wednesday took a closer look at whether San Francisco court officials were wrong to assign a new judge to the infamous 2001 dog-mauling case after the dog owner's conviction.
Although the justices gave little indication what they think about that issue, 1st District Court of Appeal Justice Paul R. Haerle made it clear the court wasn't inte...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In