This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Litigation

Dec. 5, 2015

Defense lawyers concerned about on-call scheduling litigation wave

Retailers who require employees physically show up to work or call in to see if there is a shift available, but provide no pay if there is no available work, have been in the public cross hairs for the past year, and are now subject to novel litigation.

By Matthew Blake
Daily Journal Staff Writer

Retailers who require employees physically show up to work or call in to see if there is a shift available, but provide no pay if there is no available work, have been in the public cross hairs for the past year, and are now subject to novel litigation.

Nine separate class actions were filed in the past three months in Los Angeles County and Orange County Superior Courts that accuse mall stapl...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up