This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Intellectual Property,
California Courts of Appeal

Jul. 13, 2017

‘Inevitable disclosure’ of trade secrets

California courts have long rejected the doctrine as incompatible with state law, but recent decisions suggest it may be available under the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act.

Tyler M. Paetkau

Partner
Husch Blackwell LLP

Labor and Employment

1020 Marsh Rd #200
Menlo Park , CA 94025

Email: tyler.paetkau@huschblackwell.com

See more...

Much has been said about the federalization of trade secret misappropriation law as a result of the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 (DTSA), and the differences between it and comparable state trade secret statutes, the vast majority of which are one of two versions (1979 and 1985) of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA). As federal district courts begin to interpret the DTSA and its interplay with state UTSAs, questions will naturally arise, including issues ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up