In recent years, the U.S. Supreme Court's judicial fuse has become noticeably short when it comes to state courts that rely on state public policies to thwart enforcement of arbitration agreements covered by the Federal Arbitration Act (9 U.S.C. Section 1 et seq.). In late November 2012, the court, in a terse per curiam opinion, vacated an Oklahoma Supreme Court decision that "disregards this Co...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In