This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

California Supreme Court

Mar. 8, 2013

Will the composition of the state high court affect California arbitration law?

In the past two years, two members of the Gentry, Discover Bank and Sonic-Calabasas majority have retired. By Alexa Woerner and Henry D. Lederman


By Alexa Woerner and Henry D. Lederman


In recent years, the U.S. Supreme Court's judicial fuse has become noticeably short when it comes to state courts that rely on state public policies to thwart enforcement of arbitration agreements covered by the Federal Arbitration Act (9 U.S.C. Section 1 et seq.). In late November 2012, the court, in a terse per curiam opinion, vacated an Oklahoma Supreme Court decision that "disregards this Co...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up