This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Mar. 4, 2013

Case involving federal pleading standards could be headed to high court

A significant split over federal pleading standards and a highly unusual amended opinion in a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals civil rights case has some lawyers predicting the litigation could make it to the U.S. Supreme Court.


By Henry Meier


Daily Journal Staff Writer


A significant split over federal pleading standards and a highly unusual amended opinion in a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals civil rights case has some lawyers predicting the litigation could make it to the U.S. Supreme Court.


The circuit denied a petition to hear the case en banc Tuesday, but eight judges issued a forceful dissent, which - in an unusual turn of events - elicited an amended opinion ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up