This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment

Mar. 1, 2013

Lawyers seek to add plaintiffs to suitable seating case

Attorneys for a putative class of California Kmart cashiers filed a motion Wednesday to add two new name plaintiffs to their suitable seating case against the big box retailer.

By Laura Hautala
Daily Journal Staff Writer

Attorneys for a putative class of California Kmart cashiers filed a motion Wednesday to add two new name plaintiffs to their suitable seating case against the big box retailer in the Northern District of California. The plaintiffs claim Kmart did not provide seated workstations to cashiers as required by California law. Plaintiffs already tested their claims, and lost, in a trial in November, but the class in that trial was limited...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up