By Kristian Whitten
In a state like California, whose Constitution allows "the People" to bypass the Legislature and the Governor to enact laws and provisions of the state constitution, should state elected officials who disagree with those laws enacted by the People be able to, in effect, void them by refusing to appear in federal court to defend them?
State law is trumped when it is in direct conflict with federal law and/or the ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In