I. Did the court correctly grant David's motion to dismiss on the grounds stated?
The court correctly granted David's motion because the transportation of gasoline is an activity that is of common usage in every community. More importantly, the grave risk of harm associated with transporting gasoline (likelihood of explosions) did not "cause" Patty's loss. Additionally, the court correctly ruled...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In