This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Focus (Forum & Focus)

Oct. 5, 2007

Numbers Don't Match the Rhetoric on Upcoming Supreme Court Voting Rights Case

Forum Column - By David B. Muhlhausen - Though critics charge that voter identification laws disenfranchise blacks and Hispanics, recent studies suggest that the rules may have a surprisingly contrary effect: increasing minority turnout.

FORUM COLUMN

By David B. Muhlhausen

      Justice is supposed to be blind. But let's hope that, as the Supreme Court considers whether voter identification laws are constitutional, the justices are willing to look at all the relevant information about such laws.
      First, consider how the case came about. Indiana was one of the first states to require that voters show a photo ID before casting the...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up