Intellectual Property
Jun. 14, 2002
Endorsement of 'Flexible Bar' Rule Will Affect Many Patents
Focus Column - By Mitchell P. Brook - In a long-awaited decision with implications for both patent owners and litigants, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled on the availability of the "doctrine of equivalents" to amended claims. Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., 122 S.Ct. 1831 (2002).
Focus Column
By Mitchell P. Brook
In a long-awaited decision with implications for both patent owners and litigants, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled on the availability of the "doctrine of...
By Mitchell P. Brook
In a long-awaited decision with implications for both patent owners and litigants, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled on the availability of the "doctrine of...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In