Thank you for the kind words in your article in Judicial Spotlight ("Thinking for Himself," Oct. 18).
I did, however, want to correct one error in the story. The writer stated I "declined to talk" about two cases I had handled in the past. This is untrue, and the writer has since acknowledged the same. I was never asked to comment. I doubt the readers want to hear my biased version of two past felony jury trials and the reasons for my rul...
I did, however, want to correct one error in the story. The writer stated I "declined to talk" about two cases I had handled in the past. This is untrue, and the writer has since acknowledged the same. I was never asked to comment. I doubt the readers want to hear my biased version of two past felony jury trials and the reasons for my rul...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In