Letters to the Editor
Sep. 1, 2012
Letters
What Matters
Commenting on Martin Lasden's editor's note in the June issue of California Lawyer, in which he writes: "Wouldn't the president be strongly inclined to nominate a highly intelligent woman of color between the ages of 42 and 52?" It's always nice to be reminded of what California Lawyer believes are primary qualifications for the U.S. Supreme Court.
Anthony C. Starks,San Diego Martin Lasden responds: The se...
Commenting on Martin Lasden's editor's note in the June issue of California Lawyer, in which he writes: "Wouldn't the president be strongly inclined to nominate a highly intelligent woman of color between the ages of 42 and 52?" It's always nice to be reminded of what California Lawyer believes are primary qualifications for the U.S. Supreme Court.
Anthony C. Starks,San Diego Martin Lasden responds: The se...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In