This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Public Interest

Jun. 25, 2002

High Court Misunderstands Origin of Thought, Freedom

Forum Column - By Cyrus S. Nownejad - The U.S. Supreme Court's majority ruling in Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, which struck down the Child Pornography Prevention Act as overbroad and unconstitutional, has erroneously and misguidedly defined the beginning of thought and the beginning of freedom of speech.

        Forum Column
        
        By Cyrus S. Nownejad

        The U.S. Supreme Court's majority ruling in Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, which struck down the Child Pornography Prevention Act as overbroad and unconstitutional, has erroneously and misguidedly define...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)