Alternative Dispute Resolution
May 9, 2002
'Moncharch' and 'Armendariz' Didn't Address Standard-of-Review Issue
Focus Column - By Charles W. McCoy Jr. - Prior to Moncharsh v. Heily & Blase, 3 Cal.4th 1 (1992), California courts traditionally vacated arbitration decisions where "substantial injustice" had occurred (see Abbott v. California State Auto. Ass'n, 68 Cal.App.3d 763 (1997)) or where error was "spread[] ... upon the record" and the mistake was on a "palpable and material point" (e.g. Muldrow v. Norris, 2 Cal. 74 (1852)).
Focus Column
By Charles W. McCoy Jr.
Prior to Moncharsh v. Heily & Blase, 3 Cal.4th 1 (1992), California courts traditionally vacated arbitration decisions where "substantial injustice" h...
By Charles W. McCoy Jr.
Prior to Moncharsh v. Heily & Blase, 3 Cal.4th 1 (1992), California courts traditionally vacated arbitration decisions where "substantial injustice" h...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In