Real Estate/Development
May 2, 2002
Escrow Holder Does Not Owe Duty to Third Parties
Focus Column - By Karl E. Geier and Christopher H. Doyle - Does an escrow holder owe a duty to protect the interests of nonparties to the escrow? In Summit Financial Holdings Ltd. v. Continental Lawyers Title Co., 27 Cal.4th 705 (2002), the California Supreme Court said no.
Focus Column
By Karl E. Geier and Christopher H. Doyle
Does an escrow holder owe a duty to protect the interests of nonparties to the escrow? In Summit Financial Holdings Ltd. v. Continental Lawyers Title Co., 27 Cal.4th 705 (2002), the Cal...
By Karl E. Geier and Christopher H. Doyle
Does an escrow holder owe a duty to protect the interests of nonparties to the escrow? In Summit Financial Holdings Ltd. v. Continental Lawyers Title Co., 27 Cal.4th 705 (2002), the Cal...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In