Zoning, Planning and Use
Feb. 7, 2002
Anticipated Answer
Focus Column - By Emily Longfellow - On Jan. 7, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case of Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, 00-1167. The court will decide whether a temporary development moratorium constitutes a taking. In so deciding, the court may provide guidance on what takings analysis should be used when evaluating the effect of land-use regulations.
Focus Column
By Emily Longfellow
On Jan. 7, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case of Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, 00-1167. The court will decide whether a temporary development...
By Emily Longfellow
On Jan. 7, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case of Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, 00-1167. The court will decide whether a temporary development...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In