For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Zoning, Planning and Use

Jan. 18, 2002

Water Fees

Land Use Law Practitioner Column - By Daniel J. Curtin Jr., In Utility Cost Mgm't v. Indian Wells Valley Water Dist., 26 Cal.4th 1185 (2001), the California Supreme Court upheld the application of a 120-day statute of limitations to a challenge to fees charged by the Indian Wells Valley Water District. The decision underscores the difficulty in determining the applicable statute of limitations in the land use area.

        Land Use Law Practitioner Column
        
        By Daniel J. Curtin Jr.
         
        In Utility Cost Mgm't v. Indian Wells Valley Water Dist., 26 Cal.4th 1185 (2001), the California Supreme Court upheld the application of...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)



By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.