Labor/Employment
Jan. 10, 2002
Corporate Punishment
Employment Law Practitioner Column - By Michelle A. Reinglass, In a decision making clear distinctions between retaliation and discrimination, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Winarto v. Toshiba America Electronics Components Inc., 2001 DJDAR 13152 (9th Cir. Dec. 21, 2001), reversed in part the District Court's granting of the defendants' motion for judgment as a matter of law, based on Marjati Winarto's jury verdict for retaliation.
Employment Law Practitioner Column
By Michelle A. Reinglass
In a decision making clear distinctions between retaliation and discrimination, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Winarto v. Toshiba...
By Michelle A. Reinglass
In a decision making clear distinctions between retaliation and discrimination, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Winarto v. Toshiba...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In