Criminal
Dec. 4, 2001
Lifers Forevermore
Once again, our federal court of appeals has decided to impose its own view of policy on the people of California, telling the people, the Legislature and the state courts that they all are wrong about three strikes.
By Kent Scheidegger
Once again, our federal court of appeals has decided to impose its own view of policy on the people of California, telling the people, the Legislature and the state courts that they all are wrong about three strikes. While the underlying policy question is eminently debatable, the judicial authority question is not. Andrade v. <...
Once again, our federal court of appeals has decided to impose its own view of policy on the people of California, telling the people, the Legislature and the state courts that they all are wrong about three strikes. While the underlying policy question is eminently debatable, the judicial authority question is not. Andrade v. <...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In