Litigation
Apr. 28, 2017
JAMS practices may be at center stage of restitution trial
An entrepreneur claims he wouldn't have hired JAMS neutral if he'd known of $41.5 settlement her company had to pay.
By Meghann M. Cuniff
Daily Journal Staff Writer
Daily Journal Staff Writer
The practices of the nation's pioneer alternate dispute resolution provider could take center stage in San Diego County Superior Court next week in a trial pitting an accomplished entrepreneur against a retired appellate justice and JAMS neutral.
Jury selection is scheduled to begin Monday in a false advertising lawsuit brought against California-based JAMS and Sheila Prell Sonenshine by K...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In