Labor & Employment
Jul. 16, 2014
Richard J. Simmons
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP Los Angeles Specialty: employment class action defense
It was important, he said, because the plaintiffs contended that Chipotle forced its workers to purchase shoes.
"We were able to demonstrate a variety of no-cost options - safe shoes that met the standards - were available to every worker in the state,...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In