This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Roundtable-Intellectual Property

Feb. 1, 2014

Intellectual Property

An update with K&L Gates, Keker & Van Nest; McDermott Will & Emery; Morgan, Lewis & Bockius; Morrison & Foerster; and Tensegrity Law Group. Co-moderated by Jeff Kichaven.

With no letup in patent litigation after 2011's Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (Pub. L. No. 112-29) started taking effect in early 2013, reforming patent law and procedure is back on the congressional agenda. And legislative reform remains a goal of many patent attorneys - especially those who represent defendants. But others are saying the next step should be allowing trial and appellate courts to interpret existing laws. For an update on the practice area, we met...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up