This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment

Apr. 7, 2017

$110M rest break settlement approved, but nearly derailed by fee-splitting disagreements

The agreement brought to a close more than a decade of litigation, including a pro-worker win at the state Supreme Court in December, that found it is illegal to require employees to remain on call during their rest breaks.

By America Hernandez
Daily Journal Staff Writer

LOS ANGELES — A $110 million labor settlement was preliminarily approved Thursday, bringing to a close more than a decade of litigation, including a pro-worker win at the state Supreme Court in December, that found it is illegal to require employees to remain on call during their rest breaks.

But a second fight among various plaintiffs' firms in the case has on...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up