Editor's Note
Oct. 1, 2013
Editor's Note
When it comes to child pornography, contributing writer Pamela MacLean is something of a hardliner. As she sees it, there's no moral distinction to be made between those who possess sexual images of children and those who either sell or produce them; they are all, she says, "supporting an industry that is destroying children's lives." However, for this month's cover story ("Unfit to Practice?"), MacLean confronted a somewhat different issue: Should a lawyer convicted of...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In