This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

The New Lawyer Q&A

May 17, 2011

Question One



I. Abel and Bernice's Arguments in Objecting to the Validity of the 2009 Will

2004 Will


Tess's 2004 will was a valid will leaving her estate to her children, Abel (A), Bernice (B) and Cassie (C) per stirpes. A and B will challenge the 2009 will, hoping that the 2004 will stands. The 2004 will was only impliedly revoked by the 2009 will, and if the 2009 will fails, the 2004 will should ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up