The New Lawyer Q&A
May 17, 2011
Question Six
Admissibility of Andrew's Testimony About Barney's Question
Relevance
Andrew would argue that Barney's question, as Green's clerk, was logically relevant to establish that he had the correct six winning lottery numbers. Green's would contend that the question was too prejudicial, and therefore legally irrelevant under California Evidence Code Section 352, since no foundation had been lai...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In