U.S. Supreme Court,
Civil Litigation,
Judges and Judiciary,
Corporate,
Constitutional Law,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Aug. 18, 2017
Questions left open in new Spokeo decision
The case involves whether a plaintiff has alleged a sufficiently concrete injury for purposes of Article II standing.
Randolph Hunter Pyle
Principal
Hunter Pyle Law
Labor & Employment
Phone: (510) 444-4400
Email: hunter@hunterpylelaw.com
UC Berkeley Boalt Hall
In addition to practicing law full time, Mr. Pyle is a Lecturer at Berkeley Law School where he teaches the Employment Law course to second and third year law students. He has also been a faculty member of the Stanford Law School Trial Advocacy Workshop for several yea
After remand from the U.S. Supreme Court, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a second opinion in the case of Robins v. Spokeo, 2017 DJDAR 7859 (Aug. 16, 2017) (Spokeo II). The ruling clarifies the requirements for standing under the Fair Credit Report Act. At the same time, it leaves open two critical questions that will need to be resolved by future litigation.
The pl...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In