This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

U.S. Supreme Court,
Constitutional Law,
Appellate Practice

Oct. 23, 2017

The case no one is talking about

When the Supreme Court hears Patchak v. Zinke early next month, it will address one of the trickiest tensions in the Constitution. The result could lead to a dramatic increase in the politicization of ongoing federal litigation.

Ben Feuer

Chairman
Complex Appellate Litigation Group LLP

Appellate Law

Email: ben.feuer@calg.com

Northwestern Univ School of Law

See more...

The case no one is talking about

APPELLATE ZEALOTS

In a U.S. Supreme Court term loaded with headline grabbing cases -- cakes for same-sex weddings, gerrymandering based on political party, corporate liability for international terrorism, and more -- a small appeal involving a tract of land in western Michigan where a Native American tribe has built a casino might understandably fall off the radar.

It shouldn't. When the court hears

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up