This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Year in Review Column,
Civil Litigation,
Appellate Practice,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Dec. 12, 2017

Class action litigation in the 9th Circuit

This year was an eventful one in the area of class action litigation, particularly in the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Neal R. Marder

Partner
Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld LLP

1999 Avenue of the Stars Ste 600
Los Angeles , California 90067

Phone: (310) 728-3740

Email: nmarder@akingump.com

Loyola Law School Los Angeles

Neal works with in-house counsel, senior management and boards of directors for companies, oftentimes facing high-profile, bet-the-company business disputes. He also has substantial cross-border litigation experience.

See more...

Andrew S. Jick

Associate
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Email: ajick@akingump.com

Andrew concentrates on complex commercial litigation with an emphasis on the defense of consumer and securities fraud class actions.

See more...

Josh A. Rubin

Associate
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Email: joshasrubin@gmail.com

Josh concentrates on complex commercial litigation with an emphasis on the defense of consumer and securities fraud class actions.

See more...

2017 IN REVIEW

This year was an eventful one in the area of class action litigation, particularly in the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. In 2017, the Court of Appeals declined to recognize a requirement under Rule 23 of a feasible method of determining class membership, and also issued a decision that could leave companies of liability insurance coverage for class actions alleging certain statutory violations. The court this year also revis...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up