This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

U.S. Supreme Court,
Immigration,
Government,
Constitutional Law

Apr. 5, 2018

Immigration dispute is a political question not for the courts

In the long run, only Congress and the president can resolve the underlying issue: the extent to which the United States will permit the entry of particular immigrants.

Kris Whitten

Retired California deputy attorney general

See more...

As President Donald Trump continues attempting to implement his promised immigration reforms, and specifically the rescission of former President Barak Obama's Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, the opposition keeps turning to the courts rather than Congress to put a stop to what one federal district court has called, "damaging fallout that results from excessive political partisanship." Casa de Maryland v. U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up