This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court,
Government,
Constitutional Law

May 8, 2018

Eminent domain law continues to evolve in California

Aside from the legislative activity (or inactivity), there remains a heightened sensitivity to the use of eminent domain by public agencies. Is reform on the horizon?

Bradford B. Kuhn

Partner and Chair of the Eminent Domain & Inverse Condemnation Group
Nossaman LLP

Phone: (949) 833-7800

Email: bkuhn@nossaman.com

See more...

Many states have enacted eminent domain reform since the U.S. Supreme Court's 2005 decision in Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), which broadly defined "public use" to include the government's acquiring property for another private owner to realize an economic benefit (such as increasing tax revenues). California immediately reacted in 2006 with the passage of five bills geared towards restricting the use of eminent domain. Wh...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up