Civil Litigation,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
May 21, 2018
Ruling explores when an admission is not an admission
The 9th Circuit recently issue a ruling in an ADA case, but the interesting part of the holding is how it highlights the importance of the distinction between “evidentiary” admissions and “legal” or “judicial” admissions.
Michael H. Leb
Neutral
Leb Dispute Resolutions
Labor & Employment
Phone: (310) 284-8224
Fax: (310) 284-8229
Email: michael@lebdr.com
U Michigan Law School
THE NEUTRAL CORNER is a monthly column discussing recent cases or topics of interest from a neutral's perspective.
THE NEUTRAL CORNER
On May 11, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals filed its opinion in Snapp v. BNSF Rialway, 2018 DJDAR 4372. The primary focus of this case arising under the Americans with Disabilities Act is the proper characterization of the employee's evidentiary burden at trial regarding an employer's failure to engage in the interactive process. More interesting, however, is the holding highlighting the imp...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In