This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Civil Litigation,
Labor/Employment,
California Courts of Appeal

Jun. 4, 2018

Ignoring compelling legislative history opens PAGA floodgates

Had the Court of Appeal considered all of the comments contained within the legislative history in full context, it should have reached the opposite conclusion in a recent PAGA case.

Laura Reathaford

Partner
Lathrop GPM LLP

Phone: (310) 789-4648

Email: Laura.Reathaford@LathropGPM.com

See more...

Over 10 years ago, the California Legislature implemented the Private Attorneys General Act because the administrative agency tasked with collecting civil penalties was overloaded, and it lacked the resources to bring those cases to court. PAGA deputizes private citizens to sue employers and recover civil penalties for underlying Labor Code violations.

Relying primarily on the fact the labor commissioner lacks the resources to pu...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up