U.S. Supreme Court,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Jul. 30, 2018
Cases affect further decisions unfavorable to the 9th Circuit
In a trio of cases from the recently concluded October 2017 term, the U.S. Supreme Court decided national issues widely reported by the press, the media and lawyers.
Lawrence Waddington
Neutral
JAMS
Email: waddington1@aol.com
Lawrence is a retired Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge and former assistant attorney general for the state of California. He is author of "Disorder in the Court" at Amazon.com. He also edits the 9th Circuit blog, "The 9th Circuit Watch."
In a trio of cases from the recently concluded October 2017 term, the U.S. Supreme Court decided national issues widely reported by the press, the media and lawyers.
In the first case, the court cited the California legislative mandate to post an announcement in pro-life facilities informing women of the alternative to abortion and its attendant services. National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Bece...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In