This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Civil Litigation,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Aug. 9, 2018

The real dilemma in Hyundai-Kia

In January, the 9th Circuit said certifying of a nationwide settlement class requires an analysis of the relevant laws in all 50 states. The court has now decided to rehear the case en banc.

Andrew J. Trask

Counsel
Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP

See more...

Last month, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed to an en banc rehearing of the controversial opinion in In re Hyundai-Kia. 2018 DJDAR 7419 (July 27, 2018). Back in January of this year, the original panel held, 2-1, that certifying of a nationwide settlement class still required an analysis of the relevant laws in all 50 states to ensure that individualized legal issues would not predominate over common issues. 2018 DJAR 767 (Jan. ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up