Civil Litigation,
Labor/Employment,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Nov. 7, 2018
9th Circuit continues to enforce well-crafted arbitration agreements
Recent cases demonstrate the utility of clear, unambiguous language designating the question of arbitrability to an arbitrator, along with a meaningful opt-out provision, at least within California.
Cary D. Sullivan
Partner
Jones Day
Phone: (949) 553-7513
Univ of San Diego School of Law
Cary is a partner in the firm's Business & Tort Litigation practice.
Steven M. Zadravecz
Partner
Jones Day
Phone: (949) 553-7508
Email: szadravecz@jonesday.com
Univ of San Diego SOL; San Diego CA
Steve is a partner in the firm's Labor & Employment practice.
Brent D. Knight
Partner
Jones Day
Phone: (312) 782-3939
Email: bdknight@jonesday.com
Brent is a partner in the firm's Labor & Employment practice.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals continues to provide guidance on how to craft enforceable arbitration provisions in California. In O'Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc., 2018 DJDAR 9663 (Sept. 25, 2018), the 9th Circuit issued another important decision on this issue. The court heard the consolidated appeals from four class actions in which Uber drivers allege they we...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In