U.S. Supreme Court,
Constitutional Law
Feb. 5, 2019
Liberty’s Teeth?
The U.S. Supreme Court recently agreed to hear a case that could force a hard reexamination of the past decade of Second Amendment jurisprudence. And it could force the government to justify gun control laws with real hard evidence.
C.D. Michel
Senior Partner
Michel & Associates PC
180 E Ocean Blvd Ste 200
Long Beach , California 90802
Phone: (562) 216-4444
Email: cmichel@michellawyers.com
Loyola Law School
C.D. is a civil rights attorney, civil litigator and senior partner at Michel & Associates, LLP in Long Beach. Among its many other clients, the firm has represented firearm owners, retailers, wholesalers, manufacturers, as well as the NRA and the California Rifle & Pistol Association since 1993.
Last month, the U.S. Supreme Court finally agreed to hear another Second Amendment challenge to a gun control law. The case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. City of New York, challenges New York City regulations that effectively ban la...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
U.S. Supreme Court, Constitutional Law
Reaching for handgun rights
By William Slomanson
Constitutional Law
District of Columbia v. Heller
District of Columbia's laws banning handgun possession and requiring lawfully owned handguns to be kept unloaded and dissembled are unconstitutional.
Constitutional Law
McDonald v. City of Chicago
Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause makes Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms fully applicable to States.
Constitutional Law
Caetano v. Massachusetts
Massachusetts high court's explanation for upholding state law banning possession of stun guns is contrary to U.S. Supreme Court's precedent, resulting in vacated judgment.
Constitutional Law
Peruta v. County of San Diego
San Diego County’s ‘good cause’ requirement for carrying concealed weapons in public violates constitutional right to bear arms.
Constitutional Law
Peruta v. County of San Diego
Counties in California that require concealed carry weapon applicants to demonstrate 'good cause' do not violate constitution where Second Amendment does not guarantee members of the gene...
Constitutional Law
Young v. State of Hawaii
Terms of Second Amendment indicate constitutional protection of right to 'bear' arms in public; Hawaii law strictly limiting right to open carry violates 'core of the Second Amendment.'
