This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Civil Litigation,
California Supreme Court

Mar. 6, 2019

What a court can consider when ruling on anti-SLAPP

The California Supreme Court recently ruled on what a court can consider when ruling on an anti-SLAPP.

Gregory M. Smith

Litigator
The Maloney Firm, APC

Email: gsmith@maloneyfirm.com

See more...

By now, most of California litigators are familiar with special motions to strike under Code of Civil Procedure Section 425.16 (the anti-SLAPP statute), which allows a defendant to move to dismiss a lawsuit that challenges the exercise of constitutionally protected free speech.

To prevail on an anti-SLAPP Motion, the defendant must first establish that the action arises from protected activity; if the defendant is successful, the bu...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up