Civil Litigation,
Law Practice,
California Supreme Court
Mar. 11, 2019
Lawyers should be watching high court Monster Energy case
For years, it has been standard practice for lawyers to give the “thumbs up” on settlement agreements by signing “Approved as to Form and Content.” Since the inception of the Monster Energy v. Schechter case, attorneys have been watching — and waiting — to see the implications of any final ruling.
Misasha S. Graham
Special Counsel
Thoits Law
Misasha focuses on general commercial litigation and intellectual property disputes.
Jennifer J. Hagan
Partner
Hagan Law
Jennifer specializes in business litigation, corporate governance and breaches of fiduciary duties.
For years, it has been standard practice for lawyers to give the "thumbs up" on settlement agreements by signing "Approved as to Form and Content." Since the inception of the Monster Energy v. Schechter case, attorneys have been watching -- and waiting -- to see the implications of any final ruling. Monster Energy Company v. Schechter, 26 Cal. App. 5th 54 (Aug. 18, 2018) (reversed and remanded).
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In