This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Civil Litigation,
California Supreme Court,
Appellate Practice

Mar. 18, 2019

Proper submission of pre-trial evidence: The twin hurdles

The term “admissibility” typically refers to evidence introduced at trial. A concept that is perhaps more nuanced, but typically garners far less attention, is the proper introduction of evidence in connection with a pre-trial motion.

Kasey Curtis

Partner
Reed Smith LLP

Email: kcurtis@reedsmith.com

Kasey practices in the firm's Appellate Group and is resident in the Los Angeles office.

See more...

Charles Hyun

Associate
Reed Smith LLP

Email: chyun@reedsmith.com

Charles practices in the firm's Global Regulatory Enforcement Group and is resident in the Century City Office.

See more...

Proper submission of pre-trial evidence: The twin hurdles
Shutterstock

The term "admissibility" typically refers to evidence introduced at trial. A concept that is perhaps more nuanced, but typically garners far less attention, is the proper introduction of evidence in connection with a pre-trial motion. The California Supreme Court recently took up this issue in $95

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up