Constitutional Law,
Civil Rights,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Apr. 23, 2019
9th Circuit raises bar for Article III Standing
The court has become a battleground between plaintiffs and defendants on the issue of Article III standing in the wake of Spokeo.
Jennifer A. Jackson
Partner
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP
Jennifer is the co-leader of the firm's Commercial Dispute Resolution Practice Group and also co-leads the firm's Agribusiness and Food Litigation Team. Her practice includes class action defense, commercial litigation, and product liability defense.
Matthew M. Petersen
Associate
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP's
Matthew is a member of the firm's Commercial Dispute Resolution and Class Action Practice Groups. His practice includes commercial litigation and class action defense, particularly in the context of agribusiness/food and consumer/FCRA litigation.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has become a battleground between plaintiffs and defendants on the issue of Article III standing, particularly in the context of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. Section 1681, et seq. In an unpublished decision entered on March 25, in Jaras v. Equifax, Inc., 17...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Constitutional Law
Spokeo Inc. v. Robins
Failure to consider both concreteness and particularization when analyzing injury-in-fact for Article III standing results in vacated judgment and remand.
Constitutional Law
Robins v. Spokeo Inc.
Concrete injury sufficiently alleged where plaintiff shows defendant violated federal statute that protects ‘concrete interests’ and that violation caused risk of ‘real harm.’
Consumer Law
Syed v. M-I LLC
Inclusion of liability waiver in the same document as statutorily mandated disclosure constitutes willful violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
Constitutional Law
Dutta v. State Farm
Where submitted evidence shows applicant was duly denied employment based on consumer credit report information, plaintiff cannot maintain FCRA claim based on hirer's failure to provide t...
