This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

California Supreme Court,
Administrative/Regulatory

Apr. 24, 2019

California Supreme Court upholds local wireless facility rules, but the debate isn’t over

A recent case provides much-needed clarification for municipalities seeking to exercise local control over telecommunications providers’ use of the public right-of-way.

Claire S. Lai

Associate
Meyers Nave

Phone: (800) 464-3559

Email: clai@meyersnave.com

Claire is in the firm's Municipal and Special District Law Practice Group.

See more...

Jason S. Rosenberg

Of Counsel
Meyers Nave

Phone: (800) 464-3559

Email: jrosenberg@meyersnave.com

Jason is in the firm's Municipal and Special District Law Practice Group.

See more...

California Supreme Court upholds local wireless facility rules, but the debate isn’t over
A cell tower disguised as a palm tree in Southern California. (Shutterstock)

In the age of 4G LTE and the rise of 5G wireless technology, many local governments in California find themselves tasked with deciding how to regulate telecommunication facilities within their streets, often times at the expense of community aesthetics. The desire to preserve local control frequently results in a debate with telecommunication carriers about the boundaries of local authority and the scope of Public Utilities Code sections 7901 and 7901.1.

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up