This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Civil Litigation

May 20, 2019

Novel strategy doesn’t pay for Allergan in false advertising case

In what defense attorneys are calling a novel trial strategy, pharmaceutical giant Allergan USA Inc. won $48,500 instead of the $7.2 million in damages and $54 million in disgorged profits it sought in its false advertising suit against Imprimis Pharmaceuticals Inc.

In what defense attorneys are calling a novel trial strategy, pharmaceutical giant Allergan USA Inc. won $48,500 instead of the $7.2 million in damages and $54 million in disgorged profits it sought in its false advertising suit against Imprimis Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Represented by Keith Wesley of Browne George Ross LLP and Daniel Rasmussen of Payne & Fears LLP, Imprimis was able to obtain the mild jury verdict despite U.S. Distri...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up