Plaintiffs’ attorneys in the Aliso Canyon gas leak litigation on Monday hailed a report stating Southern California Gas Company failed to properly address prior leaks at the site of the 2015 rupture, while the utility said it complied with state gas storing regulations but didn’t flag any casing issues.

Brian Panish, of Panish of Shea & Boyle LLP

Plaintiffs' attorneys in the Aliso Canyon gas leak litigation on Monday hailed a report stating Southern California Gas Co. failed to properly address prior leaks at the site of the 2015 rupture, while the utility said it complied with state gas storing regulations but didn't find any well casing issues.

The California Public Utilities Commission along with the Department of Conservation's Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resourc...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?
Sign In

Filter by date

Exact Phrase

Not the words

At least one of the words

All the words

Civil Litigation, Environmental & Energy

May 21, 2019

Plaintiffs’ attorneys and SoCalGas disagree on Porter Ranch report

Related Content

Civil Litigation, Criminal, California Supreme Court

California Supreme Court

Civil Litigation

Civil Litigation

Environmental & Energy

Civil Litigation

Civil Litigation, Judges and Judiciary, Government

Civil Litigation, Judges and Judiciary, Environmental & Energy

Environmental & Energy, Criminal

Civil Litigation, Judges and Judiciary, Environmental & Energy

Civil Litigation,

Environmental & Energy