U.S. Supreme Court,
Environmental & Energy
Jun. 3, 2019
Ratepayer's lawyer opposes SDG&E high court review bid
Ratepayer says San Diego Gas & Electric’s petition to the U.S. Supreme Court should be denied due to meritless arguments and prior denial from two courts; furthermore, arguments should be taken to the state legislature where they’re already being heard.
An attorney is opposing San Diego Gas & Electric Co.'s petition for U.S. Supreme Court review of its attempts, rejected at the state level, to charge ratepayers to recover the uninsured costs of fires for which the utility was found responsible.
Saying the utility's arguments are unmeritorious and should instead be taken to the state Legislature, Michael S. Aguirre of Aguirre Severson LLP in San Diego, filed his opposition brief...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In