This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Civil Rights,
California Supreme Court,
Appellate Practice,
Alternative Dispute Resolution

Jun. 17, 2019

MFAA versus CAA: Jurisdictional traps for the unwary in arbitration

In the last days of May two opinions were filed that explained and changed some of the rules for arbitration under the Mandatory Fee Arbitration Act and the California Arbitration Act.

Gerald G. Knapton

Senior Partner
Ropers Majeski PC

Email: gerald.knapton@ropers.com

See more...

California arbitration is usually one of two types, MFAA or CAA. The rules are sometimes different, sometimes the same. Often there are gaps in one system that are not repeated in the other. It is risky to use procedures from one for the other absent legislative direction, yet there is some cross-referencing that makes borrowing tempting to try to fill in some blanks.

The Mandatory Fee Arbitration Act, found at Business and Professio...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up