Judges and Judiciary,
Entertainment & Sports
Jun. 17, 2019
Judge chides VidAngel lawyer over video played at infringement trial
As it became apparent that a damages trial, originally estimated to take two days, was heading for a second week, U.S. District Judge Andre Birotte expressed frustration directed largely at defendant VidAngel Inc.
As it became apparent that a damages trial, originally estimated to take two days, was heading for a second week, U.S. District Judge Andre Birotte expressed frustration directed largely at defendant VidAngel Inc.
"I have to tell you," Birotte said, in comments to VidAngel attorney Morgan Philpot, a Utah-based sole practitioner. "That was not OK, and I want to make su...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Civil Litigation, Entertainment & Sports
Disney wins $62.4M in case of infringement by video service
By Steven Crighton
Civil Litigation, Intellectual Property
VidAngel claims its executives thought its infringement was lawful
By Steven Crighton
Civil Litigation, Entertainment & Sports
Studios oppose VidAngel’s ‘selective’ privilege surrender
By Steven Crighton
Civil Litigation, Intellectual Property, Entertainment & Sports
After 9th Circuit ruling, VidAngel says film streaming doesn’t hurt studios
By Steven Crighton
Civil Litigation, Intellectual Property, Entertainment & Sports
Panel hears film filter’s conspiracy claim against studios
By Steven Crighton
Civil Litigation, Entertainment & Sports
Federal judge considers scope of injunction
By Steven Crighton